There are 2 classical objections raised by Humans-to-Mars enthusiasts: These appealing objections do not stand up to close scrutiny. We cannot rule out the existence of habitats where life can metabolize on an uncolonized, untouched Mars surface. That would be a lot simpler than moving to an uninhabited planet that looks like this: This is what Mars looks like now, and humans want to go live here in case Earth is somehow rendered uninhabitable? These days most GPs (General Practitioners) are repeater idiots. Life could have originated on Earth and contaminated Mars through panspermia, or the other way around (as Mars had a liquid ocean before Earth did), or maybe life came from elsewhere and contaminated both planets. Excellent article and worthy of discussion and serious thought. Like Mark Watney growing Earth potatoes in Martian soil, introducing our biology to the Martian environment may be one sure way to contaminate the red planet irreversibly. Image: NASA/JPL/MSSS. Ten Reasons NOT to Live on Mars - Great Place to Explore. You have entered an incorrect email address! Mars would never be the same again—the irreversible move needs to be extensively debated before it is too late. [T]he first argument against human travel to Mars: contamination. Well if they start mucking around with landing and launching huge amounts of machines on the moon won’t that cause a shift in the moons orbit around earth and then what happens if that messes with the earths oceans levels and currents causing harm to sea life and human life ……I think Musk and anyone else who think settling people on Mars should be locked up the lunatics asylum because that’s exactly what they are – delusional thinkers with too much money. This article is very sensible, but people are ego driven to be the first so it will happen whether we like it or not. But it's an undeniable fact that, every time rovers like Curiosity touch down on the red planet, more than a few of these hardiest of hitchhikers have also survived the journey through interplanetary space. If there is only microbial life sure it will be interesting, but at the end the day the supremecy of man should reign supreme. What a coincidence. B) NASA has almost completely lost interest in the moon. He's the co-founder of KRDS, a digital agency with offices in 5 countries. The other big thing almost ended up being the destruction of the human race in a global nuclear war, but that's all water under the Moon. Meaning once event is over, there would be survivors, the Earth would remain the most habitable zone in the solar system for humans, and people the best positioned to repopulate it would be these survivors, and not far away Mars colonists. If Humans go to Mars, they’ll have no choice but to bring with them their microbes — this is inevitable. Probably not. 5 undeniable reasons humans need to colonize Mars — even though it's going to cost billions. THIS has been thoughouly debunked. Please. Why does it matter if there is life on Mars or not? 10. Kornmesser. ", Naturally Occurring Existential Risks: An Overview, Human-Caused Existential Risks: An Overview, Four Reasons We Haven't Yet Detected Alien Civilizations, We’ve Seeded the Moon with Life, Now Let's See if it can Survive. There are two main reasons for this: We cannot rule out the existence of habitats where life can metabolize on an uncolonized, untouched Mars surface. These are Amazon’s best-selling travel products that you may need for coming to Paris. Here are a couple: 1. Definitely will happen 3) Cost- if NASA does it then it costs taxpayers. To read more detailed rebuttals, check out these articles: Why Resilient Humans Would Survive Giant Asteroid Impact – Even With Over 90% Of Species Extinct. Their amino acids would get mixed up with current Mars life (if any), remains of past Mars life (if life ever arose there) or any pre-biotic chemistry on its way to life. The question isn’t really “Can we technically send Humans to Mars?” because sooner or later we’ll be able to — most likely thanks to Elon Musk’s hard work. Top 10 Reasons Not to Diet by Francie M. Berg 1. It has been demonstrated that some cyanobacteria, when put in a chamber simulating Mars surface conditions (same air, temperature, pressure, UV, etc.) You would agree that the center of Antarctica in winter is cold, not the best of places to set up home? There are far fewer vital resources on the Moon, and a Moon day takes a month. Top 10 Reasons Not to Go With Your Gut. Im just highlighting the fact that the “global hunger” argument falls to pieces very easily. Instead, we need to be cautious and steer around those icebergs rather than into them. D) If we somehow manage to get time travel before setting foot on Mars, we could bring the time machine to Mars and use it to live in pre-historic Mars. and partially in the shade, are able to show measurable activity and carry out photosynthesis, absorbing humidity from the atmosphere (relative humidity reaches 100% at night on Mars). While a rescue from the ISS can be performed within a day, the people who go to Mars will be an eight-month journey away, and they need to be prepared to manage on their own, Jurblum said: And I believe that the answer is: no, we should not! 2) radiation on Mars will kill the astronauts. After over 10 years of star-gazing and a significant ramp-up in funding in recent years (to a whopping $40 million in 2014), NASA has currently only found an estimated 15% of these objects so far (source: Planetary Radio 09/02/2016). NASA's Curiosity uses these to hunt for Martians. Your vision is humanity dies in it’s cradle. And seriously…. All for us. We call them ‘extremophiles’; Chroococcidiopsis, for instance, is a microbe that can withstand huge temperature swings as well as prolonged ionizing radiations. Unconvincing arguments. Yes, “precision farming” is a thing. The current record for Mars missions is 18 successes, and 25 failures. Five mains reasons are put forward, with my rebuttals underneath: But no harm building a Moon base! No matter where Earth microbes would be released, they would reach potential habitats in a matter of years, or decades at most. What a drip…. 4) Robots can travel to Mars without risk of death. Twitter. I’m no expert on any of this. And even if these concerns are addressed, there are still a few compelling reasons why it's not a good idea to go to Mars anyways (read: "Three good reasons to NOT send humans to Mars"). It is the logical next step – to setup a base on another planet, and the best candidate happens to be Mars. Even with meticulous spacecraft cleaning procedures in place, we can't catch 'em all. Or what about building a base on the Moon, or a space orbital colony? Here are a couple: It's always a concern when sending surface probes to pristine worlds such as Mars that we may inadvertently send a bunch of hitchhikers as well—that is, a whole gang of hardy microbes. But there are many reasons not to send people to another planet. Hint: Lockheed Martin aren’t involved in anti-hunger programs. Back in 2005, the United States Congress directed NASA to discover 90% of all Near-Earth Objects (NEO's) 140 meters or larger in diameter (known as 'region-killers' because they could cause catastrophic regional damage and kill millions of people in an impact event) by the year 2020. The only reason the federal government of the USA allocated tens of billions of dollars to NASA during the height of the Cold War was so that it could one-up the USSR. See the Legionnaires’ disease, caused by a microbe that evolved to feed on the Ameoba, but which happens to be able to target our white blood cells by pure coincidence and thus infect humans. We’d have to invent a great deal of new technology to go to Mars, this would have a wealth of benefits in terms of spinoffs. To think that throwing 100 billion dollars at the problem and having it magically disappear is deluded, to put it mildly. Some microbiologists say there are probably thousands of billions of microbe species on Earth, 99.999% of which have not been identified! So, given that we are in for the long haul anyway, why not clean up the house first? A lot. It is abundant with resources and suitable for exploitation to the benefit of humanity. Lichens, which are multi-cellular lifeforms, did the trick as well! Link And even fewer, 10,000, have been grown in Petri dishes. And a bunch of inspirational speeches from a gang of charismatic world leaders, I'm sure. Any such harm would make the study of Mars (which had liquid oceans for a billion years) much harder, if not impossible. thanks. The potential advantages outweigh the definitive disadvantages. It would take well over a year to get there, work there and come back. Any such harm would make the study of Mars (which had liquid oceans for a billion years) much harder, if not impossible. And for the record, by the last moon landings, much of the public interest in them had petered out. All the reasons advanced to vindicate the act of Humans traveling to Mars are either wrong or can be addressed in a way that spares Mars. Because it is hard! For a start, there are more microbes in our body than even body cells — and we’re not even counting microbes in the air we’ll breathe in the ship and on the Mars base. We are the only life in this solar system that has the capability to exploit it. This is the only way technology can make jumps in this direction – we can mine asteroids, extract resources from the moon etc. We don't need Mars to be our lifeboat in case Earth capsizes after hitting the iceberg of human stupidity. These appealing objections do not stand up to close scrutiny. , caused by a microbe that evolved to feed on the Ameoba, but which happens to be able to target our white blood cells by pure coincidence and thus infect humans. Narrow perspective, in my honest opinion – if the “study” is your central argument. These reasons include the massive push forward in technology and STEM education that has helped us economically and has linked the world together. 1) fuel, payload, weight issue not yet solved Not to mention nobody should be allowed to make the decision to remain here for humanity. Very sad problem with this world. ), Meet Proxima b, the Closest Exoplanet to Earth, "Five Problems with Sending Humans to Mars. When the the first Apollo mission landed on the moon they only had 30 seconds of fuel left, 30 SECONDS! I suspect that AI and robotic development will reach the point that by the time we can send and return a few people to Mars, we can send indestructible “human-like” robots that can accomplish the same things (and more) on a Mars mission that a real human could do, but without the life-sustaining needs and fragility of humans. 9. Some microbes will still get through, and many these rugged little creatures are able to survive in the vacuum of space—perhaps even all the way down to the surface of Mars. Anyone who uses this argument has zero understanding of how space exploration (and charity) is funded. Human bodies are walking biomes that each host trillions of microbes in everything from our hair to our feces. This is reflected in the many names, familiar to all who read sci-fi/terraforming novels including Al-Qahira (the Arabs), Huo Hsing (the Chinese), Mangala (the Indians), Nirgal (the Babylonians), Kasei ( the Japanese), Ares (the Greeks) or our own word Mars which comes … I give your long term planing a 1/10. Or Earth life could simply end up eating Mars life’s food and starve it. This is just one simple minded man’s opinion. Not convincing, as there are so many other technical challenges we could, and have, set ourselves to overcome, like putting an end to climate change, or to hunger. It is great that we sent people safely to and from the moon, but now people have more computing power in their hands than the entire NASA space program in the moon flight years, so just imagine what IA and robotics will be like in 15-20 years. Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS. It’s totally person why you’re wrong so you’re not actually wrong. Ok we're onto the second reason why we should not go to Mars. NASA does best when it has a single strong focus, a Mars project would give them a long term sense of mission that they don’t have now. That big, cold, lonely lump of rock spinning through the endless void 54.6 million kilometers away? I just think there has to be reasons that you get up in the morning and you want to live” as he puts it. Humanity's eventual journey through interplanetary space and landing on Mars won't be about winning; it will be about progress. Mars gets a lot of meteorites from Earth, and it’s possible that microbes could survive such a trip aboard a meteorite, so again any harm that could be done with Earth life has been done, so no need to fuss about that threat any more. 10 Things You Should Know About Life On Mars. As if it might develop into complex life if we leave alone? 10 Reasons Not to Go to a Doctor June 25, 2016 June 26, 2016 Digger for Truth 11 Comments [Most of these points overlap. Definitely will happen This post is more about the whole medical service, rather than specifically visiting a doctor] 1 – Incompetence. 1) fuel, payload, weight issue not yet solved 2) radiation on Mars will kill the astronauts. We are supposedly threatened by life extinction events, man-made or otherwise, and we need to become a multi-planetary species as soon as possible. 10 Good Reasons Not to Colonize Mars Robert Walker , Science 2.0 August 15, 2013 Mars is a fascinating planet, the most like Earth of all the planets in the solar system, and may help us to understand much about the origins of life on Earth. In such a scenario, any Mars life would probably be our Archaebacteria’s cousin. Bill Nye’s 5 reasons we can’t live on Mars. A hole on Mars. Maybe we are an alien race that terraformed Earth and moved here. It's no longer competition that will get humans to Mars, but cooperation. Yet we still have hunger. That would again confuse our devices and ruin the whole study. The day/night rhythm is very similar to ours here on Earth: a Mars day is 24 hours, 39 minutes and 35 seconds; The only other two celestial bodies in orbits near the Earth are our Moon and Venus. All rights reserved. If you have enjoyed reading this article, do take a moment to subscribe to our email newsletter here. Now for the asteroid problem—which is a more tangible type of iceberg, like the one that sank the Titanic. But what about the good reasons not to go to Mars? A Guide to Detecting Exoplanets (and Maybe Aliens! Mars is an obvious target for exploration because it is close by in our Solar System, but there are many more reasons to explore the Red Planet. We’ve got some awesome news for you. You’re basically advocating for the eventual extinction of humans so everything else can in the solar system can stay pristinely dead. Earth is not the unsinkable ship it's been advertised as (just ask the neanderthals and the woolly mammoths and the saber-toothed cats of yesteryear). Mars is a connected environment as it has an atmosphere—albeit a thin one—and has large dust storms that sweep across the whole planet. Fact is, humans can not go to Mars today or probably within 10-20 years no matter how much we might want to. Editorial cartoonist covering government and social policy; particular interest in issues of … Get the latest happenings within Asia's space industry delivered to your inbox every week! And there's also no reason to think that the same people who destroyed Earth wouldn't do the same to Mars, whether it be through environmental destruction or warfare or some other short-sighted venture. Space is one of the areas that was on the horizon of development for the Founding Fathers of the Indonesia, with the establishing of... SpaceTech Asia is an online publication based in Singapore. Here are 10 ways gut feelings can lead you straight into harm’s way. Twitter Could microbes be living in this soil? Sure Columbus succeeded in crossing the Atlantic ocean in primitive boats, but I’m sure he and his crew would have preferred modern jet travel, so let’s keep on developing scientific solutions for life on earth rather than rush to send a select few humans on a voyage that can be better done with future technology. Mars may be the only other place in the Solar System on which life could have existed in the past (or presently does exist), so ensuring that we disturb that environment as little as possible should be our main priority. The scientific reasons for going to Mars can be summarised by the search for life, understanding the surface and the planet’s evolution, and preparing for future human exploration. An image of the surface of Mars. To no end. Nonetheless we definitely should not only explore but ultimately colonize Mars.
X4 Star Wars Mod Discord, Johnny Johnny Yes Papa Open Your Mouth, The World Evolutions A Universal Time, The Command Movie 2019 Cast, The Command Netflix Trailer, Aneel Ranadive Linkedin, Mini Spoons For Spices, Awakenings Festival 2020,